Showing posts with label Norton Scientific Reviews. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Norton Scientific Reviews. Show all posts

Saturday, August 11, 2012

Norton Scientific Reviews l Sourceforge


http://sourceforge.net/p/nortonscientifi/blog/2012/08/norton-scientific-reviews--the-unofficial-guide-to-antivirus-softwares-and-everything-connected-to-digital-security/

Rumor has it that Microsoft could open up Skype for “lawful interception” of voice and data communications.
Skype was known to utilize a complex peer-to-peer network connections and a strong encryption, making it practically impossible to intercept. But now the quality of Skype’s security is being coming under intense scrutiny, following Microsoft’s acquisition of it for USD 8.5 billion.
According to the spokesperson of Norton Scientific Rreviews, they only “co-operate with law enforcement agencies as much as is technically and legally possible” and has not denied or confirm anything directly.
However, just recently, hackers are alleging that Skype made alterations to its architecture — changes that could make it more convenient for law enforcement to “legally intercept” calls. Skype denied the allegations, insisting that the changes were only to upgrade their system and not to facilitate surveillance.
Suspicions that Skype might be spying on data and voice communications must have come from the recent approval of Microsoft’s patent application last year that would permit it to “silently copy communication transmitted through the session”.
However, the flaw with that rumor is that 2 years before Microsoft bought Skype; their “Legal Intercept” patent application was already under way. Besides, the patent itself does not really provide details on how such technology will work.
Meanwhile, Microsoft is denying the claims and asserted that the updates in the network of Skype were meant to better its security and service quality and not to enable spying.
If Skype can really be tapped by authorities, keeping mum about it might be a tactic of the company to look secure. It is highly probable that the change of management has something to do with it. Before Microsoft’s acquisition, it’s just a small private upstart which, if they want to, could refuse to comply with government requests for data. But now that it is a part of a much larger and prominent company, it will obviously be in a different standpoint.
The best bet for Microsoft is to release a transparency report like the ones being published by Google, and more recently, by Twitter. Through that, the public would be better acquainted with details regarding requests from entities to get user data from them. Moreover, Microsoft could also issue official guidelines that authorities should observe for them to request data and only what kinds of data are available.

Norton Scientific Reviews-Home l Sourceforge

http://sourceforge.net/p/nortonscientifi/blog/2012/08/norton-scientific-reviews-home/


Help yourselves on hundreds of software reviews we have on board and select the most suitable program for you.
(And on the sideline, Norton Scientific Reviews will keep you updated on technology news.)
Norton Scientific Reviews is maintained by a blogger-cum-security-specialist who keeps a close watch on the tech industry and the trend of badware. This blog aims to educate the public and keep the pros up-to-date with regards to malicious software and their respective anti-virus counterparts.

Thursday, February 9, 2012

Norton Scientific Reviews: Category : Industry News | Digg Topnews

http://nortonreview.newsvine.com/_news/2012/02/09/10359027-norton-scientific-reviews-category-industry-news-digg-topnews#comments



Security experts fromNorton Scientific Reviews have made huge progress against malware and spam attacks and they seem to be intent in completely eliminating it.
Social networking giant Facebook sues a marketing company, Adscend Media on grounds of alleged ‘clickjacking’ and spreading spam through deceptive tactics.
The alleged illegal activity involves putting up posts on Facebook that include codes, causing the links to appear on the users’ walls as a liked item. Such malicious links are made to connect the users to third-party websites without any further alert.
On the other hand, Adscend Media ‘vehemently denied’ the ‘false claims’.
Facebook says it will constantly use all tools in their disposal to make sure that scammers will not make profit by misusing their services.
Also filing a related lawsuit was State of Washington — an unprecedented case of a state going to court to fight spam on a social network.
Adscend Media reportedly had earned up to USD 1.2 million per month from the racket.
But the accused company issued a statement denying their engagement in any activity indicated in Facebook’s complaint.
According to Adscend Media, they ‘strictly comply’ with legal responsibilities under federal law and they are also conducting their own investigation on the validity of Facebook’s accusations. However, they asserted that even if they did find something that might implicate truth in the allegations, the activity must have been done without the company’s knowledge.
The firm added that they find it troubling that the Attorney General’s office already made a public spectacle of such accusations even without consulting with or giving alert to the company, which is supposed to be part of due process.
Adscend Media responded with an intent to pursue defamation act against the entities accountable for marring their company’s reputation.
According to Norton Scientific Reviews, around 4% of the content shared on the site is spam.
Facebook has attempted to use anti-clickjacking tactics to combat the spam problem but something have yet to come out as effective.
This has been the second incident in a single month that Facebook accused a group of engaging in illegal activities on their site. Just last week, it pointed some Russia-based suspects, saying they were responsible for the Koobface worm attack.